Literature Review

A Literature Review - reviews the literature. It is like standing in the library and saying "these shelves are books and journals on aspects of xxxx", "these shelves are by people who have xxx perspective". It is not about one or two books. A Literature Review overviews what is out there and gives you a context for where you stand.

Module Two - cycle and crafting your inquiry is a way to better understand your own field of practice

Module Two sessions

Also have a look at what people in the session posted about it.

Amanda  https://amcbahonspp.blogspot.co.uk ,

Lauren http://laurenharper26.blogspot.co.uk,

Henry http://henryrhodes.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/skype-call-discussion-031017.html?m=1,

Jessica http://jessicastokesbappblog.blogspot.co.uk,

Ann http://annwall95.blogspot.co.uk

Emily http://emilyrichardsbapp.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/module-2-group-skype-assumption.html

Important points we discussed:

Do all the tasks in the handbook as a cycle – go through them once, this will help start to shape your inquiry. But do not take too much time on one if it does not move you forward. Then go through them again this time the parts that you were stuck on will have shifted because of the work you did on the other tasks. For instance – in the first cycle of doing the tasks, your inquiry field might be vague. Don’t spend days and days trying to get a perfect question. Have an area then start thinking about the ethical considerations/ concerns/ arguments/ reflections in that area. This might make you clearer about the area in the general field you are interested in. Or it might be as you start to think about data collections tools you have an aha moment. After the literature review you should have had some changes because you would have explored and discovered new ideas from other people around the topic. Try to do the cycle of tasks at least three times layering and shaping your inquiry each time.

The literature review is the most important tool to help you see what you don’t know. It helps you realise other perspectives on your topic and it is these other perspectives and ideas your inquiry should be about. Your inquiry should not be about proving something you already feel or know because:

Firstly, the 12 weeks of Module Three is not long enough to ‘prove’ something.

Secondly, this does not help your practice or helps you develop  – it just makes you feel better about where you are currently! That is not what your BA is for – that is your best friends job!!

The inquiry should inform your practice – help you develop it. BUT NOT help you start a whole new branch of practice. You should be able to clearly explain how your past work, and current work inform your inquiry. But the inquiry gives you time to really focus or understand something within your practice. It is very useful to focus on a kind of historical inquiry where you find out what other people have done and how that fits with the 2017 field of practice that you are involved with.

Tip: if you think not much has been written or done on your topic – a historical inquiry will be really useful because it is likely you just don’t know about it not that nobody else in the history of arts practices has thought of what you are thinking of!!

In the on-line session we used a adapted version of Liz Lerman’s https://lizlerman.com   Critical Response Process: A method for getting useful feedback on anything you make from dance to dessert.

Each person in the call spoke about their practice and their inquiry and we followed the Liz Lermans Critical Response Process to feedback. This is something you can do with a friend or your SIG group. Describe your inquiry and get feedback on what people understand about what you are doing and how clearly they see it fitting with your practice. IT IS NOT to get feedback that you are doing a good job!! Or to get them to tell you what to do. It is to see if what you are thinking makes sense outside of your own head!! Also talking about your inquiry plans  and asking and answering questions helps you to better understand your own thinking-feeling.

Liz Lerman is presenting at Middlesex University this month as part of Dance Umbrella. Tuesday October 10^th 6pn at Hendon  MDX and Wednesday 11^th 4;30 at National Theatre http://www.danceumbrella.co.uk/event/dance-umbrella-lecture/  (if you are in London, UK those days).

Have a go exploring your ideas through feedback. Here is how her steps are described:

Campus session: ideas and theory

Campus session March 16^th

We had a Hendon campus session on March 16^th. It was great afternoon. We talked in the classroom and also went to the Shepard Library on campus.

This is an overview of the conversation:

We talked about ideas and theory.
What do they do? In the first module you are introduced to three ideas:

-       The idea of reflection

-       The idea of networks

-       The idea of communication (via the web particularly)

These ideas are threads that will run through the whole of the course (all three modules). They are not taught pieces of information to memorize and write about at the end. They are ideas to stimulate your thinking about your own Professional Practice deeply or differently. Therefore, the order you are introduced to them is not important but we had to choose an order  (that is the one in the Module Handbook). So, do not think of them like a tree, building up from starting a blog at the beginning of Module One and layering up to handing-in an artefact in Module Three – this is like a tree model. As if you were climbing up something.

Instead think of them all as equally feeding your understanding of your Professional Practice – like a rhizome.

each idea is a shoot (an idea shoot) that connects underground. You cannot see the connections from above ground. Your study is about finding the connections. So it is not about climbing a tree of ideas we have put there for you. It is about nurturing ideas, looking at them carefully and finding the connections between them and you. Connections that will be different for different people because all your professional practices are different.

So at the end of each module what you hand-in is the result of looking carefully at the ideas that have manifested during the term. And then making connections between those ideas and your professional practice.

So that being said, what could we say about 'theory'?

Theory could be thought of as what someone else has come up with having done that process of looking at ideas carefully and making connections for themselves. So you can link your connections with connections (theory) someone else has made and published about. They have spent more time looking carefully so you can often be guided by (their) theory.

BUT theory is not a justification for you to do what you want!!

Theory is a specific set of connections someone has made. You can’t pick and choose – “I will cite Smith about this connection and ignore that connection she made.” !! It is not about agreeing with every thing Smith said. But you have to know enough about Smith that if you cite her as why you are doing something in one place you can explain why you are not doing something else she said in another place. 

Theory is not a neat bag to wrap-up your actions in. Its not an excuse to do something you want to do. Theory is more like the core of what you are doing it indicates what you should do. We talked about theory being like the bones not the skin.

Theory indicates what you can do – you are following a set of connections to see what they are like and how they lead you. You can’t chop and change without explaining why - and you are not on your own look at what the theory would santo do. You can notice where they differ for you or the situation you are in. So if theory is partly going on someone else’s ride (which you need to do because that someone else has spend a great deal of time thinking about ideas you are just finding out about), what is stopping you from crashing. If someone else is driving the bus how do you make sure you don’t end up in an accident???

-----Ethics. Having looked at ethical issues means you are aware of where you are not willing to go on the ride. It means you are prepared for possible issues and it means you have drawn a line in the sand as to where you are not willing to go with the theory. Ethics is not about a set of rules, it is about being aware of and thinking about the consequences of what you are doing. We said

Ethics is a response to what the theory indicates.

All this was talking about what is called a theoretical framework. The framework from which you are thinking. We went to the library to look at Journal articles. To see if we could spot the theortical framework the authors were working with. We looked at the bibliography* which shows whose theories the author was 'riding'. Then we read the Introduction or Abstract to see what parts of the theory journey the author was on board with, what changed, and what questions they had about it. (*That is what a literature review is partly for to share the places you are constructing your ideas from, to show the rides you have taken as you have thought about things.)

Read participants-of-the-session's blog posts to see what they found. 

Victoria Vickers

Jessica Stokes

Eleanor Byrne

Jessica Dinmore

Megan Louch

Amanda Conroy

We watched this Ted Talk. It tells us a lot about – believing /following a theory, using ethics, how ethical issues change for you depending on which theory you are following, how looking at an idea carefully changes your own personal practices, and how conversation and discussion with others also looking at ideas carefully helps you develop or better define where you stand.

Please comment on this whole post in the comment below:

Adesola