In our Module Three session today we talked about the three ways you are reporting on your
inquiry:
- Written essay
- Professional artefact
- Oral presentation
Each of these are forms for telling the whole
story of your inquiry.
- They all should include:
- why you did it
- what you intended to do
- What happened (the data collection)
- What the data told you when you analysed it and
triangulated with the literature and your own Professional practice
experiences.
- How it has impacted on your professional
practice.
So the artefact is not the result of the
inquiry - The artifact is another way of saying what you say in the essay. It is
just a professional artefact - 'a thing' that other professionals like yourself
can engage with and understand.
Remember in Module One: Howard Gardner’s work:
Communication that responds to different learning
styles such as naturalistic, bodily kinaesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal,
verbal linguistic, logical mathematical, existential, spatial visual, and
musical.
In your
professional practice do people use verbal linguistics to explain things OR do
they move, sing, act feel, chat, draw to explain ideas to each other. Use
the language of your practice NOT WORDS. The Professional Artefact is
your opportunity to use the language of your practice.
We talked
mostly about the Professional Artefact. This was about how you can start to
envision what it will be. However you cannot really start to work too much on
the artefact until you have done some analysis. Here are two really important
points:
Firstly,
analysis is not just summing up your data. Analysis is a critical look at the
whole experience comparing three things – the literature (the ideas other
people have said), your own experience including your experience of collecting
the data, your reflective diary, and the experiences before the inquiry that
led you to be interested in doing it in the first place, and lastly the data
you collect. Looking at themes and resonance and contradictions across all
three of these is called triangulation.
Doing this is how you can critically look at the questions you posed at the
beginning of the inquiry. Doing this unpicks everything and is always (whatever
level of work you are doing), always disorientating, somewhat frightening and
confusing because it is the point where you are opening yourself up to look for
something new, to stretch yourself beyond what you know you know. But that is
the heart of the inquiry; be brave. Because it is after data collection you
might feel you need to tidy everything up not make a mess in your head but the
data collection is not the climax of the inquiry it is just getting something
to do the inquiry with. After collecting data, it is not time to tidy up, its
time to get mixing all the ingredients.
The artefact
is NOT the result of the inquiry, like the answer to the whole thing. The
artefact is as much about the process as the critical review paper you are
writing. So please think as if you are in fact handing in Two things that
explain the inquiry - TWO artefacts.
- The first is
in the form of a formalised academic artefact – a critical
review.
- The second is
in the form of something that is found in your professional practice (culture)
it is a professional artefact. (We cannot say what this will
be because it is different for each person according to their work /
profession.)
We can help in
telling you what the first artefact (the critical review looks like – in fact
we give you guide-lines on what it looks like how many words etc… and we also
give you guide-lines on how to start making it – when to start drafting etc…).
But just because we help out with what the academic artefact (the critical
review) looks like doesn’t mean the critical review IS the inquiry. It is a
result of the inquiry just as the professional artefact is too. The Inquiry –
what you are documenting with the two artefacts is the activity and reflective
thought you do.
Think of the
Professional artefact as another way of explaining your inquiry. You can see
you need to do the whole inquiry before you can be really clear about the
content of the critical review or the professional artefact.
In fact you
will explain your inquiry in three ways through writing (critical review),
through talking (oral presentation) and through x (x=professional artefact).
Each of these ways of sharing offer unique advantages for communication and
have things that cannot be communicated very well through them. Think about how
you will use the three forms to give us a full rounded understanding of the
whole inquiry process.
Adesola