It has been the last day
(half a day).
Last nights performance was
really great. Yjastros (flamenco dance) was so amazing. It was as if passion took
the form of sound in the singing and guitar and then vitality sadness, joy,
life and death all bubbled in the skin and bones of the dancers and exploded
into their movements. I was exhausted after watching.
Dancing Earth was also
great, a beautiful performance that was made more layered by the gentle, clear
reverence for the lived experience of being on this earth.
This morning there were two
panels and a closing plenary. The first panel looked at the influence of
language on gender identity in Breaking. It looked at how some dancers have
moved away from the word ‘Breakdancing’
because of the commercialisation of the word to calling what they do b-boying
but then what are the women doing then. Some call themselves b-girls but others
feel that makes it seem as if what they are doing is a different kind of dance
purely because they are girls doing it.
Then Melissa Hudson Bell
gave a paper about the work of Amara Tabor Smith who uses the eating of food as
part of the performance experience. I really enjoyed the paper and want to read
it again because I was distracted during it by how it reaffirmed how much I
love to create dance myself, that has a community based / ethnographic based starting point.
How much I love the idea of an audience being a part of a ritual hand-washing
as they enter the performance space as Melissa described Amara’s work.
The last paper in this panel
looked at Jarabe Tapatio: dances in Mexico that were taught as traditional
dances. In many papers, this weekend, exploring dances from different countries
I have heard about traditional dances that were designated ‘traditional’ but only
taught or even created in twentieth century. The were all responses to
governments wanting to establish or recreate an identity for the whole country
for instance in Cambodia after 90% of the artists were killed during Khmer
Rouge, Korea as a part of shaking off colonialism, in Mexico (as this paper
explored) when the country was made up of a number of differing groups of
people with different languages and customs. It made me think how powerful the
arts are. Governments turn to them to give cohesion to their country – look at
UK Olympics. Music and arts and dance are how we define who we are as a nation
and yet when it comes to funding that importance does not seem to be echoed.
The second panel was about
the different re-stagings of Einstein on the Beach (first paper) and the second
paper was about the history of Breaking from early dancers to 1990 and pointing
out the importance of video replication in how the dance spread across the
globe. People videoed battles and then people in other countries or places or
genders watched the videos and learnt a shared vocabulary that later when they
came together gave then something in common. But Mary Fogarty was pointing out
that many of the things they assumed they had in common in person were not
there. She has published this paper and again I am going to read it again.
The closing Plenary was nice
but I went into it very up and hopeful but at the end we talked about the
separation between practice and theory which I don’t acknowledge. And I had
felt others came from the same place so talking about it as something to
strategise for made me question if people thought as I do as widely as I had
assumed. For me my practice is my theory: it is how I understand the world.
It has been great to meet so
may interesting, interested people at the conference.
Thankyou so much for this post, It's so descriptive! I felt like i'd watched the performance myself! It's really interesting to hear what other people are doing and really how different the everyday is to you in comparison to myself and others.
ReplyDelete